Should I start Bucky Irving or Woody Marks this week? Week 9 Standard (2026)

THE FF CALL

Start Bucky Irving

+2.1 projected edge · Standard

Start Bucky Irving over Woody Marks for Week 9 Standard: 12.8 projected points versus 10.7.

Bucky Irving: 16.3 FP recent scoring average.
Bucky Irving: 7.5% matchup reduction against CHI.

Forecast updated Nov 6, 2026, 5:52 PM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Bucky Irving

RB · TBStats & schedule

12.8FF projected

↓ -0.2 vs ESPN

at CHI

Sun 8:20 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Woody Marks

RB · HOUStats & schedule

10.7FF projected

↓ -1.6 vs ESPN

at LAC

Sun 4:05 PM ET

Why this pick?

Bucky Irving

FF projection: 12.8 FP -0.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 13.0 FP
Sleeper: 14.6 FP
FantasyPros: 13.4 FP
Boosted Trees: 9.6 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Bucky Irving faces CHI in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 16.3 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 7.5%.

Woody Marks

FF projection: 10.7 FP -1.7vs ESPN
ESPN: 12.4 FP
Sleeper: 11.6 FP
FantasyPros: 11.9 FP
Boosted Trees: 6.4 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Woody Marks faces LAC in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 8.1 fantasy points.

Bucky Irving projects for 12.8 points in standard scoring, 2.1 more than Woody Marks. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 6, 2026, 5:52 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

RB. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

17.022.6

FF MEAN

1
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs MIASun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 22.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 21.8Sleeper 20.3FantasyPros 21.4
22.6Expected FP
2
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs NYJSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 20.0Sleeper 18.4FantasyPros 18.2
18.9Expected FP
3
Christian McCaffreyRB · SF vs LVSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.1Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 17.2Sleeper 19.2FantasyPros 17.0
18.1Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.