Should I start Jake Elliott or Wil Lutz in Week 9 (2026, Half-PPR)?

THE FF CALL

Start Wil Lutz

+2.8 projected edge · Half-PPR

Start Wil Lutz over Jake Elliott for Week 9 Half-PPR: 8.1 projected points versus 5.3.

Jake Elliott: His availability is unresolved. Recheck his status before kickoff; a projection is not confirmation that he will play.

Jake Elliott · Injury report dated Nov 5, 2026, 7:22 PM ET

Wil Lutz: 10.0 FP recent scoring average.
Jake Elliott: 3.0 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 6, 2026, 5:08 PM ET · Half-PPR

FF PICK

Wil Lutz

K · DENStats & schedule

8.1FF projected

↓ -0.7 vs ESPN

at CAR

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Jake Elliott

K · PHIStats & schedule

5.3FF projected

↓ -0.6 vs ESPN

vs NYG

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Wil Lutz

FF projection: 8.1 FP -0.7vs ESPN
ESPN: 8.8 FP
Sleeper: 7.4 FP
FantasyPros: 7.6 FP
Boosted Trees: 8.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Wil Lutz faces CAR in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 10.0 fantasy points.

Jake Elliott

FF projection: 5.3 FP -0.7vs ESPN
ESPN: 6.0 FP
Sleeper: 6.4 FP
FantasyPros: 5.9 FP
Boosted Trees: 8.5 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Jake Elliott faces NYG in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 3.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 6.25%. Jake Elliott is questionable. Check his availability before kickoff.

Wil Lutz projects for 8.1 points, 2.8 more than Jake Elliott.

Updated Nov 6, 2026, 5:08 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

K. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

8.210.6

FF MEAN

1
Brandon AubreyK · DAL vs INDSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.5Sleeper 10.0FantasyPros 9.1
10.6Expected FP
2
Tyler BassK · BUF vs MINMon 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.0Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.5Sleeper 8.2FantasyPros 8.2
10.0Expected FP
3
Ka'imi FairbairnK · HOU vs LACSun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.3Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 9.8Sleeper 9.0FantasyPros 8.7
9.3Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.