Should I start Rashee Rice or Tim Patrick? (Half-PPR Week 12 2026)

THE FF CALL

Start Rashee Rice

+10.9 projected edge · Half-PPR

Start Rashee Rice over Tim Patrick for Week 12 Half-PPR: 11.1 projected points versus 0.2.

Rashee Rice: 11.1 FP recent scoring average.
Rashee Rice: 3.75% matchup lift against BUF.

Forecast updated Nov 14, 2026, 11:25 AM ET · Half-PPR

FF PICK

Rashee Rice

WR · KCStats & schedule

11.1FF projected

↑ +1.3 vs ESPN

at BUF

Thu 8:20 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Tim Patrick

WR · NYJStats & schedule

0.2FF projected

at MIA

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Rashee Rice

FF projection: 11.1 FP +1.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 9.8 FP
Sleeper: 11.7 FP
FantasyPros: 10.1 FP
Boosted Trees: 10.5 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Rashee Rice faces BUF in Week 12. Recent scoring average: 11.1 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 3.75%.

Tim Patrick

FF projection: 0.2 FP
Sleeper: 0.1 FP
Boosted Trees: 1.1 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Tim Patrick faces MIA in Week 12. Recent scoring average: 0.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 5%.

Rashee Rice projects for 11.1 points in half-PPR scoring, 10.9 more than Tim Patrick. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 14, 2026, 11:25 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

WR. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

15.220.8

FF MEAN

1
Ja'Marr ChaseWR · CIN vs NOSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 20.8Sleeper 16.1FantasyPros 17.0
18.5Expected FP
2
CeeDee LambWR · DAL vs PHIThu 4:30 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 17.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 17.0Sleeper 15.6FantasyPros 15.2
17.6Expected FP
3
Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR · SEA vs SFSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 16.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 16.4Sleeper 20.6FantasyPros 15.9
16.8Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.