Should I start Eddy Pineiro or Jake Bates in Week 11 (2026, Standard)?

THE FF CALL

Start Jake Bates

+1.9 projected edge · Standard

Start Jake Bates over Eddy Pineiro for Week 11 Standard: 9.1 projected points versus 7.2.

Jake Bates: 10.0 FP recent scoring average.
Jake Bates: 6.25% matchup lift against TB.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 6:52 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Jake Bates

K · DETStats & schedule

9.1FF projected

↑ +0.4 vs ESPN

vs TB

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Eddy Pineiro

K · SFStats & schedule

7.2FF projected

↑ +0.8 vs ESPN

vs MIN

Sun 8:20 PM ET

Why this pick?

Jake Bates

FF projection: 9.1 FP +0.4vs ESPN
ESPN: 8.7 FP
Sleeper: 8.2 FP
FantasyPros: 8.8 FP
Boosted Trees: 9.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Jake Bates faces TB in Week 11. Recent scoring average: 10.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 6.25%.

Eddy Pineiro

FF projection: 7.2 FP +0.9vs ESPN
ESPN: 6.3 FP
Sleeper: 8.0 FP
FantasyPros: 8.1 FP
Boosted Trees: 7.8 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Eddy Pineiro faces MIN in Week 11. Recent scoring average: 4.5 fantasy points.

Jake Bates projects for 9.1 points in standard scoring, 1.9 more than Eddy Pineiro. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 6:52 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

K. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

7.711.3

FF MEAN

1
Ka'imi FairbairnK · HOU vs INDThu 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 11.1Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.9Sleeper 8.7FantasyPros 10.3
11.1Expected FP
2
Brandon AubreyK · DAL vs TENSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.1Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.3Sleeper 8.7FantasyPros 10.4
10.1Expected FP
3
Tyler BassK · BUF vs MIASun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.2Sleeper 7.9FantasyPros 7.7
9.9Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.