Should I start Justin Watson or Tim Patrick? (Half-PPR Week 11 2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Tim Patrick

Week 11 · Half-PPR

Tim Patrick has the higher current FF forecast: 0.2 FP versus 0.0 FP. The 0.2-point gap is small; saved experimental forecasts provide context, not a separate override.

Tim Patrick: 0.0 FP recent scoring average.
Tim Patrick: 8.75% matchup lift against LAC.

Forecast updated Nov 12, 2026, 4:50 PM ET · Half-PPR

THE ALTERNATIVE

Justin Watson

WR · KCStats & schedule

0.0FF projected

vs ARI

Sun 1:00 PM ET

FF PICK

Tim Patrick

WR · NYJStats & schedule

0.2FF projected

at LAC

Sun 4:05 PM ET

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

WR. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

13.419.5

FF MEAN

1
CeeDee LambWR · DAL vs TENSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 18.7Sleeper 18.1FantasyPros 17.6
19.5Expected FP
2
Ja'Marr ChaseWR · CIN vs WASMon 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.7Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 19.4Sleeper 16.7FantasyPros 16.4
18.7Expected FP
3
Tee HigginsWR · CIN vs WASMon 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 16.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 13.7Sleeper 14.6FantasyPros 13.4
16.8Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.