Should I start Mark Andrews or Xavier Worthy this week? (Standard Week 10 2026)

BEFORE YOU DECIDE

Check availability before choosing

Xavier Worthy: His availability is unresolved. Recheck his status before kickoff; a projection is not confirmation that he will play. FantasyPros estimates a 98% chance of playing (checked Nov 12, 7:44 AM ET). His projections are shown below, but this comparison needs an availability check. Check back later this week for updated projections and injury news before setting your lineup.

Xavier Worthy · Injury report dated Nov 11, 2026, 4:42 PM ET

Mark Andrews: 1.9 FP recent scoring average.
Mark Andrews: 5% matchup reduction against LAC.

Forecast updated Nov 12, 2026, 7:44 AM ET · Standard

CHECK AVAILABILITY

Mark Andrews

TE · BALStats & schedule

3.8FF projected

↓ -0.2 vs ESPN

vs LAC

Mon 8:15 PM ET

CHECK AVAILABILITY

Xavier Worthy

WR · KCStats & schedule

4.2FF projected

↓ -1.0 vs ESPN

at ATL

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Mark Andrews

FF projection: 3.8 FP -0.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 4.0 FP
Sleeper: 4.4 FP
FantasyPros: 3.9 FP
Boosted Trees: 6.0 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Mark Andrews faces LAC in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 1.9 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 5%.

Xavier Worthy

FF projection: 4.2 FP -1.0vs ESPN
ESPN: 5.2 FP
Sleeper: 4.1 FP
FantasyPros: 3.6 FP
Boosted Trees: 5.8 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Xavier Worthy faces ATL in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 2.4 fantasy points. Xavier Worthy is questionable. Check his availability before kickoff. FantasyPros estimates a 98% chance of playing (checked Nov 12, 7:44 AM ET).

Updated Nov 12, 2026, 7:44 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

THE MATCHUP, IN CONTEXT

What separates Mark Andrews and Xavier Worthy?

Availability takes priority over the points comparison. The headline warning above still applies; the supporting forecasts below do not clear an injured player to start.

The available estimates disagree: Sleeper, FantasyPros, Boosted Trees lean toward Mark Andrews, while ESPN leans toward Xavier Worthy. That disagreement is a reason to examine the matchup and availability rather than count providers as votes.

Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews has a 3.8 FP forecast in Standard against LAC. His recorded recent scoring average is 1.9 FP, putting this forecast 1.9 points above that average. The position-specific defensive adjustment reduces the FF estimate by 5%; it is already included in the projection.

Xavier Worthy

Xavier Worthy has a 4.2 FP forecast in Standard at ATL. His recorded recent scoring average is 2.4 FP, putting this forecast 1.8 points above that average. His availability needs checking before kickoff; a projection does not confirm that he will play.

Compare the saved forecasts side by side

Source	Mark Andrews	Xavier Worthy	Projected edge
ESPN	4.0 FP	5.2 FP	Xavier Worthy +1.2
Sleeper	4.4 FP	4.1 FP	Mark Andrews +0.3
FantasyPros	3.9 FP	3.6 FP	Mark Andrews +0.3
Boosted Trees	6.0 FP	5.8 FP	Mark Andrews +0.1

Model save times and conditional-input notes are listed in Why this pick. These forecasts use the selected scoring preset; they do not replace custom league rules.

Before the first kickoff. Mark Andrews: Mon 8:15 PM ET. Xavier Worthy: Sun 1:00 PM ET. If a questionable player has the later kickoff, keep an eligible later-game replacement available. Where your league allows it, putting a later-game starter in FLEX can preserve swap options.

This is a lineup choice, not an instruction to drop the other player. For bye coverage, roster moves and your league’s actual playoff weeks, build your GamePlan ↗.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

FLEX. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

17.122.6

FF MEAN

1
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs NESun 9:30 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 20.7Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 19.4Sleeper 19.5FantasyPros 19.9
20.7Expected FP
2
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs ATLSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 20.4Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 22.6Sleeper 18.4FantasyPros 18.4
20.4Expected FP
3
Christian McCaffreyRB · SF vs DALSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 17.1Sleeper 18.0FantasyPros 17.1
18.2Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.

YOUR LINEUP · A CLOSER LOOK

More decisions involving your players

Compare another option for the same lineup decision. These are Start/Sit decisions for players you already own. Availability and scoring can change the call.

Flex · Week 10