
Should I start Ladd McConkey or Zach Charbonnet this week? Week 9 Standard (2026)
THE FF CALL
Slight lean: Zach Charbonnet
Week 9 ยท Standard
Zach Charbonnet has the higher current FF forecast: 8.0 FP versus 7.5 FP. The 0.5-point gap is small; saved experimental forecasts provide context, not a separate override.
- Zach Charbonnet: 2.9 FP recent scoring average.
- Ladd McConkey: 5.2 FP recent scoring average.
Forecast updated ยท Standard



Zach Charbonnet
RB ยท SEAStats & schedule โบLadd McConkey
- Recent scoring average: 5.2 FP.
- The HOU defensive matchup changes the FF estimate up 5%.
- Last 3 recorded games: 2.7 targets per game.
Zach Charbonnet
- Recent scoring average: 2.9 FP.
Ladd McConkey
Ladd McConkey faces HOU in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 5.2 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 5%.
Zach Charbonnet
Zach Charbonnet faces ARI in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 2.9 fantasy points.
THE MATCHUP, IN CONTEXT
What separates Ladd McConkey and Zach Charbonnet?
Ladd McConkey and Zach Charbonnet are separated by 0.4 projected FP. That margin is too small to treat the FF order as a decisive advantage. The FF pick above follows the same expected-points and displayed-tie policy as Fortified Rankings; the saved source comparison below provides supporting context.
The available estimates disagree: Sleeper leans toward Ladd McConkey, while ESPN, FantasyPros, Boosted Trees lean toward Zach Charbonnet. That disagreement is a reason to examine the matchup and availability rather than count providers as votes.
Ladd McConkey
Ladd McConkey has a 7.5 FP forecast in Standard against HOU. His recorded recent scoring average is 5.2 FP, putting this forecast 2.4 points above that average. The position-specific defensive adjustment raises the FF estimate by 5%; it is already included in the projection.
Zach Charbonnet
Zach Charbonnet has a 8.0 FP forecast in Standard against ARI. His recorded recent scoring average is 2.9 FP, putting this forecast 5.1 points above that average.
Compare the saved forecasts side by side
| Source | Ladd McConkey | Zach Charbonnet | Projected edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESPN | 6.8 FP | 9.7 FP | Zach Charbonnet +2.9 |
| Sleeper | 8.7 FP | 8.5 FP | Ladd McConkey +0.2 |
| FantasyPros | 7.2 FP | 8.9 FP | Zach Charbonnet +1.7 |
| Boosted Trees | 6.4 FP | 14.2 FP | Zach Charbonnet +7.8 |
Before the first kickoff. Ladd McConkey: Sun 4:05 PM ET. Zach Charbonnet: Sun 4:25 PM ET. If a questionable player has the later kickoff, keep an eligible later-game replacement available. Where your league allows it, putting a later-game starter in FLEX can preserve swap options.
Your next decision
Scoring & lineup notes
FORTIFIED RANKINGS ยท
FLEX. The bigger picture.
Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.
- 1
Jahmyr GibbsRB ยท DET vs MIASun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailableMean 22.6Range unavailableMedian unavailableESPN 21.8Sleeper 20.5FantasyPros 21.322.6Expected FP - 2
Kenneth Walker IIIRB ยท KC vs NYJSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailableMean 19.0Range unavailableMedian unavailableESPN 20.0Sleeper 18.6FantasyPros 18.219.0Expected FP - 3
Jonathan TaylorRB ยท IND vs DALSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailableMean 18.2Range unavailableMedian unavailableESPN 16.9Sleeper 15.6FantasyPros 16.218.2Expected FP
How the forecast and ranges work
FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.
Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10โP90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.
Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.
YOUR LINEUP ยท A CLOSER LOOK
More decisions involving your players
More Week 9 decisions
Zach Charbonnet8.0projected FP
Rhamondre Stevenson9.3projected FP
Zach Charbonnet8.0projected FP
J.K. Dobbins7.8projected FP
Zach Charbonnet8.0projected FP
Breece Hall8.1projected FP
Zach Charbonnet8.0projected FP
Jordan Mason7.6projected FP
Jahmyr Gibbs22.6projected FP
Kenneth Walker III19.0projected FP
Kenneth Walker III19.0projected FP
Jonathan Taylor18.2projected FP
Jonathan Taylor18.2projected FP
Christian McCaffrey18.2projected FP
Christian McCaffrey18.2projected FP
Bijan Robinson16.6projected FP
Bijan Robinson16.6projected FP
Javonte Williams16.0projected FP
Javonte Williams16.0projected FP
James Cook III14.9projected FP
Ladd McConkey