Should I start Colby Parkinson or Darnell Washington this week? Week 10 Standard (2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Darnell Washington

+0.8 projected edge · Standard

Start Darnell Washington over Colby Parkinson for Week 10 Standard: 5.6 projected points versus 4.8.

Darnell Washington: 7.9 FP recent scoring average.
Colby Parkinson: 3.0 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 10, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Darnell Washington

TE · PITStats & schedule

5.6FF projected

↑ +0.3 vs ESPN

at CIN

Sun 8:20 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Colby Parkinson

TE · LARStats & schedule

4.8FF projected

= 0.0 vs ESPN

at ARI

Sun 4:05 PM ET

Why this pick?

Darnell Washington

FF projection: 5.6 FP +0.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 5.3 FP
Sleeper: 4.8 FP
FantasyPros: 4.7 FP
Boosted Trees: 5.2 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Darnell Washington faces CIN in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 7.9 fantasy points.

Colby Parkinson

FF projection: 4.8 FP Evenvs ESPN
ESPN: 4.8 FP
Sleeper: 4.1 FP
FantasyPros: 4.4 FP
Boosted Trees: 6.1 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Colby Parkinson faces ARI in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 3.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 5%.

Darnell Washington projects for 5.6 points in standard scoring, 0.8 more than Colby Parkinson. The gap is small; late injury news or your league’s scoring can change the choice.

Updated Nov 10, 2026, 2:16 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

TE. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

7.510.8

FF MEAN

1
Brock BowersTE · LV vs SEASun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.7Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.3Sleeper 10.7FantasyPros 10.3
10.7Expected FP
2
George KittleTE · SF vs DALSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.7Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.5Sleeper 10.8FantasyPros 10.8
10.7Expected FP
3
Isaiah LikelyTE · NYG vs WASThu 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.1Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 7.5Sleeper 8.1FantasyPros 8.3
9.1Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.