Should I start Breece Hall or Jadarian Price this week? Week 9 Standard (2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Breece Hall

+0.8 projected edge · Standard

Start Breece Hall over Jadarian Price for Week 9 Standard: 8.1 projected points versus 7.3.

Breece Hall: 3 external sources project points.
Jadarian Price: 3.7 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 5, 2026, 5:35 PM ET · Standard

THE WEEK 9 FILE · REST OF SEASONBraelon and the Jets.Hall’s return. Cooper’s target swing. The roles and routes behind your next Jets decision.Read the analysis ↗

FF PICK

Breece Hall

RB · NYJStats & schedule

8.1FF projected

↓ -0.2 vs ESPN

at KC

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Jadarian Price

RB · SEAStats & schedule

7.3FF projected

↓ -2.3 vs ESPN

vs ARI

Sun 4:25 PM ET

Why this pick?

Breece Hall

Fortified8.1

ESPN8.3

Sleeper6.3

FantasyPros8.5

Boosted TreesExperimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET8.9

Breece Hall faces KC in Week 9.

Jadarian Price

Fortified7.3

ESPN9.6

Sleeper8.0

FantasyPros7.6

Boosted TreesExperimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET10.6

Jadarian Price faces ARI in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 3.7 fantasy points.

Breece Hall projects for 8.1 points in standard scoring, 0.8 more than Jadarian Price. The gap is small; late injury news or your league’s scoring can change the choice.

Updated Nov 5, 2026, 5:35 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

RB. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

15.622.6

FF MEAN

1
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs MIASun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 22.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 21.8Sleeper 20.5FantasyPros 21.3
22.6Expected FP
2
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs NYJSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.0Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 20.0Sleeper 18.6FantasyPros 18.2
19.0Expected FP
3
Jonathan TaylorRB · IND vs DALSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 16.9Sleeper 15.6FantasyPros 16.2
18.2Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.