Should I start Andre Szmyt or Ka'imi Fairbairn this week? (Standard Week 10 2026)

THE FF CALL

Start Ka'imi Fairbairn

+1.5 projected edge · Standard

Start Ka'imi Fairbairn over Andre Szmyt for Week 10 Standard: 9.8 projected points versus 8.2.

Ka'imi Fairbairn: 14.0 FP recent scoring average.
Andre Szmyt: 9.3 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 13, 2026, 8:08 PM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Ka'imi Fairbairn

K · HOUStats & schedule

9.8FF projected

↓ -0.2 vs ESPN

at CLE

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Andre Szmyt

K · CLEStats & schedule

8.2FF projected

↓ -1.3 vs ESPN

vs HOU

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Ka'imi Fairbairn

FF projection: 9.8 FP -0.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 10.0 FP
Sleeper: 8.6 FP
FantasyPros: 8.3 FP
Boosted Trees: 7.9 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Ka'imi Fairbairn faces CLE in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 14.0 fantasy points.

Andre Szmyt

FF projection: 8.2 FP -1.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 9.5 FP
Sleeper: 7.6 FP
FantasyPros: 7.1 FP
Boosted Trees: 9.1 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Andre Szmyt faces HOU in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 9.3 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 1.25%.

Ka'imi Fairbairn projects for 9.8 points in standard scoring, 1.5 more than Andre Szmyt. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 13, 2026, 8:08 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

K. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

8.311.2

FF MEAN

1
Tyler BassK · BUF vs NYJSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.2Sleeper 8.7FantasyPros 9.1
10.2Expected FP
2
Brandon AubreyK · DAL vs SFSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.0Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.4Sleeper 8.9FantasyPros 8.5
10.0Expected FP
3
Ka'imi FairbairnK · HOU vs CLESun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.0Sleeper 8.6FantasyPros 8.3
9.8Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.