Should I start Darnell Washington or Tucker Kraft this week? Week 10 PPR (2026)

THE FF CALL

Start Tucker Kraft

+1.1 projected edge · PPR

Start Tucker Kraft over Darnell Washington for Week 10 PPR: 9.4 projected points versus 8.3.

Tucker Kraft: 13.6 FP recent scoring average.
Tucker Kraft: 10% matchup reduction against MIN.

Forecast updated Nov 8, 2026, 6:46 PM ET · PPR

FF PICK

Tucker Kraft

TE · GBStats & schedule

9.4FF projected

↑ +0.1 vs ESPN

vs MIN

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Darnell Washington

TE · PITStats & schedule

8.3FF projected

↑ +0.4 vs ESPN

at CIN

Sun 8:20 PM ET

Why this pick?

Tucker Kraft

FF projection: 9.4 FP +0.1vs ESPN
ESPN: 9.3 FP
Sleeper: 10.3 FP
FantasyPros: 9.6 FP

Tucker Kraft faces MIN in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 13.6 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 10%.

Darnell Washington

FF projection: 8.3 FP +0.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 8.0 FP
Sleeper: 7.1 FP
FantasyPros: 7.6 FP

Darnell Washington faces CIN in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 10.8 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 1.25%.

Tucker Kraft projects for 9.4 points in PPR scoring, 1.1 more than Darnell Washington. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 8, 2026, 6:46 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

TE. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

13.218.1

FF MEAN

1
Isaiah LikelyTE · NYG vs WASThu 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 16.4Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 13.5Sleeper 13.2FantasyPros 16.8
16.4Expected FP
2
Trey McBrideTE · ARI vs LARSun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 15.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 15.3Sleeper 18.1FantasyPros 13.8
15.9Expected FP
3
Brock BowersTE · LV vs SEASun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 15.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 17.4Sleeper 16.7FantasyPros 13.5
15.9Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.