Should I start Darren Waller or Greg Dulcich this week? (Half-PPR Week 10 2026)

THE FF CALL

Start Darren Waller

+1.7 projected edge · Half-PPR

Start Darren Waller over Greg Dulcich for Week 10 Half-PPR: 7.8 projected points versus 6.2.

Darren Waller: 10.7 FP recent scoring average.
Darren Waller: 2.5% matchup lift against NO.

Forecast updated Nov 12, 2026, 8:32 AM ET · Half-PPR

FF PICK

Darren Waller

TE · CARStats & schedule

7.8FF projected

↑ +0.8 vs ESPN

at NO

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Greg Dulcich

TE · MIAStats & schedule

6.2FF projected

↓ -0.1 vs ESPN

at IND

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Darren Waller

FF projection: 7.8 FP +0.8vs ESPN
ESPN: 7.0 FP
Sleeper: 6.9 FP
FantasyPros: 6.8 FP
Boosted Trees: 5.8 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Darren Waller faces NO in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 10.7 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 2.5%.

Greg Dulcich

FF projection: 6.2 FP -0.1vs ESPN
ESPN: 6.3 FP
Sleeper: 5.6 FP
FantasyPros: 6.3 FP
Boosted Trees: 5.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Greg Dulcich faces IND in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 6.6 fantasy points.

Darren Waller projects for 7.8 points in half-PPR scoring, 1.7 more than Greg Dulcich. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 12, 2026, 8:32 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

TE. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

10.513.6

FF MEAN

1
George KittleTE · SF vs DALSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 13.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 12.8Sleeper 13.4FantasyPros 13.2
13.6Expected FP
2
Brock BowersTE · LV vs SEASun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 13.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 12.4Sleeper 13.2FantasyPros 12.1
13.5Expected FP
3
Trey McBrideTE · ARI vs LARSun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 12.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.5Sleeper 11.8FantasyPros 12.0
12.5Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.