Should I start CeeDee Lamb or Darnell Mooney this week? (Half-PPR Week 10 2026)

BEFORE YOU DECIDE

One or both games have started

Treat these as projection comparisons, not a fresh lineup instruction. Check your league’s lineup locks before making changes.

Forecast updated Nov 14, 2026, 6:30 PM ET · Half-PPR

THE ALTERNATIVE

CeeDee Lamb

WR · DALStats & schedule

16.3FF projected

↓ -0.7 vs ESPN

vs SF

Sun 4:25 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Darnell Mooney

WR · NYGStats & schedule

4.0FF projected

↓ -1.2 vs ESPN

vs WAS

Thu 8:15 PM ET

Why this pick?

CeeDee Lamb

FF projection: 16.3 FP -0.7vs ESPN
ESPN: 17.0 FP
Sleeper: 16.2 FP
FantasyPros: 17.0 FP
Boosted Trees: 15.9 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

CeeDee Lamb faces SF in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 19.9 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 6.25%.

Darnell Mooney

FF projection: 4.0 FP -1.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 5.2 FP
Sleeper: 2.9 FP
FantasyPros: 4.0 FP
Boosted Trees: 4.4 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Darnell Mooney faces WAS in Week 10. Recent scoring average: 3.9 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 1.25%.

Treat these as projection comparisons, not a fresh lineup instruction. Check your league’s lineup locks before making changes. FantasyPros live refresh is unavailable. Stored same-week projections are used (oldest provider fetch Nov 14, 2026, 1:01 PM ET).

Updated Nov 14, 2026, 6:30 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

WR. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

15.720.3

FF MEAN

1
Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR · SEA vs LVSun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 20.3Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 18.5Sleeper 19.4FantasyPros 18.6
20.3Expected FP
2
Amon-Ra St. BrownWR · DET vs NESun 9:30 AM ETCheck availability · Range unavailable
Mean 18.1Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 16.4Sleeper 15.7FantasyPros 16.3
18.1Expected FP
3
Ja'Marr ChaseWR · CIN vs PITSun 8:20 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 17.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 18.6Sleeper 16.8FantasyPros 17.1
17.5Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.