Should I start Kyle Williams or Mark Redman in Week 18 (2026, Standard)?

BEFORE YOU DECIDE

Check availability before choosing

Mark Redman: One source has him at zero while another expects points. Check his game status before relying on this comparison. His projections are shown below, but this comparison needs an availability check. Check back later this week for updated projections and injury news before setting your lineup.

Kyle Williams: 3.4 FP recent scoring average.
Kyle Williams: 5% matchup reduction against MIA.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 12:55 PM ET · Standard

CHECK AVAILABILITY

Kyle Williams

WR · NEStats & schedule

3.0FF projected

↑ +0.5 vs ESPN

vs MIA

Sun 12:00 AM ET

CHECK AVAILABILITY

Mark Redman

TE · GBStats & schedule

0.5FF projected

↓ -0.2 vs ESPN

vs DET

Sun 12:00 AM ET

Why this pick?

Kyle Williams

FF projection: 3.0 FP +0.5vs ESPN
ESPN: 2.5 FP
Sleeper: 2.5 FP
FantasyPros: 3.9 FP
Boosted Trees: 3.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Kyle Williams faces MIA in Week 18. Recent scoring average: 3.4 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 5%.

Mark Redman

FF projection: 0.5 FP -0.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 0.7 FP
Sleeper: 0.0 FP
Boosted Trees: 1.0 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Mark Redman faces DET in Week 18. Recent scoring average: 0.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 10%.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 12:55 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

FLEX. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

16.826.4

FF MEAN

1
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs LVSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 23.1Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 26.4Sleeper 19.7FantasyPros 19.0
23.1Expected FP
2
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs GBSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 21.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 17.7Sleeper 20.3FantasyPros 20.1
21.5Expected FP
3
Bijan RobinsonRB · ATL vs CARSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 17.6Sleeper 18.8FantasyPros 16.8
19.8Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.