Should I start Jake Bates or Tyler Loop in Week 18 (2026, Standard)?

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Tyler Loop

+0.7 projected edge · Standard

Start Tyler Loop over Jake Bates for Week 18 Standard: 8.2 projected points versus 7.5.

Tyler Loop: 5.0 FP recent scoring average.
Tyler Loop: 10% matchup lift against PIT.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 5:04 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Tyler Loop

K · BALStats & schedule

8.2FF projected

vs PIT

Sun 12:00 AM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Jake Bates

K · DETStats & schedule

7.5FF projected

↓ -1.3 vs ESPN

at GB

Sun 12:00 AM ET

Why this pick?

Tyler Loop

FF projection: 8.2 FP
Sleeper: 8.0 FP
FantasyPros: 7.2 FP
Boosted Trees: 9.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Tyler Loop faces PIT in Week 18. Recent scoring average: 5.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 10%.

Jake Bates

FF projection: 7.5 FP -1.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 8.7 FP
Sleeper: 8.2 FP
FantasyPros: 7.4 FP
Boosted Trees: 8.9 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Jake Bates faces GB in Week 18. Recent scoring average: 10.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 10%.

Tyler Loop projects for 8.2 points in standard scoring, 0.7 more than Jake Bates. The gap is small; late injury news or your league’s scoring can change the choice.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 5:04 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

K. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

7.911.6

FF MEAN

1
Ka'imi FairbairnK · HOU vs TENSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.4Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.1Sleeper 8.7FantasyPros 10.1
10.4Expected FP
2
Tyler BassK · BUF vs NYJSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.6Sleeper 7.9FantasyPros 8.9
10.2Expected FP
3
Cam LittleK · JAC vs INDSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 9.6Sleeper 8.3FantasyPros 9.7
9.9Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.