Should I start Max Bredeson or Payne Durham? (Half-PPR Week 16 2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Payne Durham

Week 16 · Half-PPR

Payne Durham has the higher current FF forecast: 0.3 FP versus 0.1 FP. The 0.2-point gap is small; saved experimental forecasts provide context, not a separate override.

Payne Durham: 0.0 FP recent scoring average.
Max Bredeson: 3.75% matchup reduction against WAS.

Forecast updated Nov 14, 2026, 1:28 PM ET · Half-PPR

THE ALTERNATIVE

Max Bredeson

RB · MINStats & schedule

0.1FF projected

vs WAS

Sun 12:00 AM ET

FF PICK

Payne Durham

TE · TBStats & schedule

0.3FF projected

= 0.0 vs ESPN

at ATL

Sun 12:00 AM ET

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

FLEX. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

13.124.4

FF MEAN

1
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs NYGMon 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 23.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 22.1Sleeper 24.4FantasyPros 21.2
23.6Expected FP
2
Tony PollardRB · TEN vs LVSun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 18.4Sleeper 13.1FantasyPros 14.8
19.8Expected FP
3
Bucky IrvingRB · TB vs ATLSun 12:00 AM ETRange unavailable
Mean 18.3Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 18.6Sleeper 16.3FantasyPros 15.5
18.3Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.