Should I start Drew Sample or Mark Redman in Week 15 (2026, Half-PPR)?

BEFORE YOU DECIDE

Check availability before choosing

Mark Redman: One source has him at zero while another expects points. Check his game status before relying on this comparison. His projections are shown below, but this comparison needs an availability check. Check back later this week for updated projections and injury news before setting your lineup.

Drew Sample: 3.1 FP recent scoring average.
Mark Redman: 0.0 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 10:41 AM ET · Half-PPR

CHECK AVAILABILITY

Drew Sample

TE · CINStats & schedule

1.8FF projected

↑ +0.3 vs ESPN

at CAR

Sun 1:00 PM ET

CHECK AVAILABILITY

Mark Redman

TE · GBStats & schedule

0.7FF projected

↓ -0.3 vs ESPN

vs MIA

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Drew Sample

FF projection: 1.8 FP +0.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 1.5 FP
Sleeper: 1.9 FP
Boosted Trees: 2.2 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Drew Sample faces CAR in Week 15. Recent scoring average: 3.1 fantasy points.

Mark Redman

FF projection: 0.7 FP -0.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 1.0 FP
Sleeper: 0.0 FP
Boosted Trees: 0.8 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Mark Redman faces MIA in Week 15. Recent scoring average: 0.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 6.25%.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 10:41 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

TE. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

8.915.7

FF MEAN

1
Brock BowersTE · LV vs DENSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 15.7Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 13.2Sleeper 14.9FantasyPros 12.6
15.7Expected FP
2
Trey McBrideTE · ARI vs NYJSun 4:05 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 13.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 12.9Sleeper 14.0FantasyPros 11.6
13.6Expected FP
3
George KittleTE · SF vs LACThu 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 11.3Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 12.4Sleeper 13.1FantasyPros 8.9
11.3Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.