Should I start Jake Bates or Tyler Loop in Week 14 (2026, Half-PPR)?

THE FF CALL

Start Jake Bates

+1.6 projected edge · Half-PPR

Start Jake Bates over Tyler Loop for Week 14 Half-PPR: 9.5 projected points versus 7.9.

Jake Bates: 10.0 FP recent scoring average.
Jake Bates: 1.25% matchup lift against TEN.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 1:11 PM ET · Half-PPR

FF PICK

Jake Bates

K · DETStats & schedule

9.5FF projected

↓ -0.3 vs ESPN

vs TEN

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Tyler Loop

K · BALStats & schedule

7.9FF projected

vs TB

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Jake Bates

FF projection: 9.5 FP -0.3vs ESPN
ESPN: 9.8 FP
Sleeper: 8.9 FP
FantasyPros: 9.5 FP
Boosted Trees: 9.2 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Jake Bates faces TEN in Week 14. Recent scoring average: 10.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 1.25%.

Tyler Loop

FF projection: 7.9 FP
Sleeper: 8.2 FP
FantasyPros: 7.0 FP
Boosted Trees: 9.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET

Tyler Loop faces TB in Week 14. Recent scoring average: 5.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 6.25%.

Jake Bates projects for 9.5 points in half-PPR scoring, 1.6 more than Tyler Loop. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 1:11 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

K. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

8.810.2

FF MEAN

1
Ka'imi FairbairnK · HOU vs WASSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.1Sleeper 9.2FantasyPros 9.5
10.2Expected FP
2
Cam LittleK · JAC vs PITMon 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 8.9Sleeper 8.8FantasyPros 9.1
9.9Expected FP
3
Jake BatesK · DET vs TENSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 9.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 9.8Sleeper 8.9FantasyPros 9.5
9.5Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.