Should I start Luke Farrell or Tim Patrick in Week 12 (2026, Standard)?

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Luke Farrell

+0.7 projected edge · Standard

Start Luke Farrell over Tim Patrick for Week 12 Standard: 0.8 projected points versus 0.2.

Luke Farrell: 0.7 FP recent scoring average.
Luke Farrell: 8.75% matchup reduction against SEA.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 10:25 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Luke Farrell

TE · SFStats & schedule

0.8FF projected

= 0.0 vs ESPN

vs SEA

Sun 4:25 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Tim Patrick

WR · NYJStats & schedule

0.2FF projected

at MIA

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Luke Farrell

FF projection: 0.8 FP Evenvs ESPN
ESPN: 0.8 FP
Sleeper: 0.9 FP
Boosted Trees: 1.3 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Luke Farrell faces SEA in Week 12. Recent scoring average: 0.7 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 8.75%.

Tim Patrick

FF projection: 0.2 FP
Sleeper: 0.1 FP
Boosted Trees: 1.1 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Tim Patrick faces MIA in Week 12. Recent scoring average: 0.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 5%.

Luke Farrell projects for 0.8 points in standard scoring, 0.7 more than Tim Patrick. The gap is small; late injury news or your league’s scoring can change the choice.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 10:25 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

FLEX. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

15.322.4

FF MEAN

1
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs CHIThu 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 20.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 19.1Sleeper 22.4FantasyPros 18.3
20.8Expected FP
2
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs BUFThu 8:20 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 19.4Sleeper 16.9FantasyPros 18.5
19.2Expected FP
3
Bucky IrvingRB · TB vs CARMon 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.0Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 16.9Sleeper 16.3FantasyPros 15.3
19.0Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.