Should I start Emmett Johnson or John Bates in Week 11 (2026, Standard)?

THE FF CALL

Start Emmett Johnson

+6.0 projected edge · Standard

Start Emmett Johnson over John Bates for Week 11 Standard: 7.0 projected points versus 1.0.

Emmett Johnson: 10.5 FP recent scoring average.
John Bates: 0.0 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 11, 2026, 10:39 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Emmett Johnson

RB · KCStats & schedule

7.0FF projected

↑ +2.2 vs ESPN

vs ARI

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

John Bates

TE · WASStats & schedule

1.0FF projected

↑ +0.4 vs ESPN

vs CIN

Mon 8:15 PM ET

Why this pick?

Emmett Johnson

FF projection: 7.0 FP +2.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 4.8 FP
Sleeper: 5.3 FP
FantasyPros: 7.7 FP
Boosted Trees: 4.4 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Emmett Johnson faces ARI in Week 11. Recent scoring average: 10.5 fantasy points.

John Bates

FF projection: 1.0 FP +0.4vs ESPN
ESPN: 0.6 FP
Sleeper: 1.1 FP
FantasyPros: 1.3 FP
Boosted Trees: 1.6 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

John Bates faces CIN in Week 11. Recent scoring average: 0.0 fantasy points.

Emmett Johnson projects for 7.0 points in standard scoring, 6.0 more than John Bates. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff.

Updated Nov 11, 2026, 10:39 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

FLEX. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

11.724.2

FF MEAN

1
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs ARISun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 20.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 24.2Sleeper 18.2FantasyPros 18.4
20.8Expected FP
2
James Cook IIIRB · BUF vs MIASun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 17.5Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 19.0Sleeper 14.9FantasyPros 16.6
17.5Expected FP
3
Tony PollardRB · TEN vs DALSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 17.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 15.1Sleeper 11.7FantasyPros 13.6
17.2Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.