Should I start Jake Bates or Will Reichard? (PPR Week 11 2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Will Reichard

+0.6 projected edge · PPR

Start Will Reichard over Jake Bates for Week 11 PPR: 9.5 projected points versus 8.9.

Will Reichard: 7.0 FP recent scoring average.
Will Reichard: 6.25% matchup lift against SF.

Forecast updated Nov 12, 2026, 3:14 PM ET · PPR

FF PICK

Will Reichard

K · MINStats & schedule

9.5FF projected

↑ +0.1 vs ESPN

at SF

Sun 8:20 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Jake Bates

K · DETStats & schedule

8.9FF projected

↑ +0.3 vs ESPN

vs TB

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Will Reichard

FF projection: 9.5 FP +0.1vs ESPN
ESPN: 9.4 FP
Sleeper: 8.8 FP
FantasyPros: 8.6 FP

Will Reichard faces SF in Week 11. Recent scoring average: 7.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 6.25%.

Jake Bates

FF projection: 8.9 FP +0.2vs ESPN
ESPN: 8.7 FP
Sleeper: 8.7 FP
FantasyPros: 8.8 FP

Jake Bates faces TB in Week 11. Recent scoring average: 10.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 2.5%.

Will Reichard projects for 9.5 points in PPR scoring, 0.6 more than Jake Bates. The gap is small; late injury news or your league’s scoring can change the choice.

Updated Nov 12, 2026, 3:14 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

K. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

7.711.6

FF MEAN

1
Ka'imi FairbairnK · HOU vs INDThu 8:15 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 11.6Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 10.9Sleeper 9.4FantasyPros 10.3
11.6Expected FP
2
Brandon AubreyK · DAL vs TENSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.9Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.3Sleeper 9.7FantasyPros 10.4
10.9Expected FP
3
Tyler BassK · BUF vs MIASun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 10.3Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 11.2Sleeper 9.2FantasyPros 7.7
10.3Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.