Should I start Rashod Bateman or Rome Odunze this week? Week 8 Standard (2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Rome Odunze

+0.8 projected edge · Standard

Start Rome Odunze over Rashod Bateman for Week 8 Standard: 5.5 projected points versus 4.7.

Rashod Bateman: 3.2 FP recent scoring average; 10% matchup lift against BUF.
Rome Odunze: 4.3 FP recent scoring average; 10% matchup reduction against SEA.

Forecast updated Oct 28, 2026, 1:40 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Rome Odunze

WR · CHIStats & schedule

5.5FF projected

↓ -0.5 vs ESPN

at SEA

Mon 8:15 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Rashod Bateman

WR · BALStats & schedule

4.7FF projected

↑ +0.3 vs ESPN

at BUF

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Rome Odunze

Fortified5.5

ESPN6.0

Sleeper6.6

FantasyPros6.0

Rome Odunze faces SEA in Week 8. Recent scoring average: 4.3 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 10%.

Rashod Bateman

Fortified4.7

ESPN4.4

Sleeper3.7

FantasyPros4.6

Rashod Bateman faces BUF in Week 8. Recent scoring average: 3.2 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 10%.

Rome Odunze projects for 5.5 points in standard scoring, 0.8 more than Rashod Bateman. The gap is small; late injury news or your league’s scoring can change the choice. FantasyPros refresh is rate-limited. Same-week cached projections are used (under one hour old; oldest update Oct 28, 2026, 1:07 AM ET).

Updated Oct 28, 2026, 1:40 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

SEE THE WHOLE SEASON

Don’t just win Sunday.
Win what’s next.

Your roster. Every week.
A plan for the playoffs.

WEEK 8PLAYOFFS ♛

Build my Game Plan Your team. Your league’s rules.See an example GamePlan ↗

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.