
Should I start Drake London or Malik Nabers this week? Week 9 Standard (2026)
THE FF CALL
Slight lean: Malik Nabers
Week 9 ยท Standard
Malik Nabers has the higher current FF forecast: 11.9 FP versus 11.6 FP. The 0.3-point gap is small; saved experimental forecasts provide context, not a separate override.
Forecast updated ยท Standard



Malik Nabers
WR ยท NYGStats & schedule โบDrake London
- His prior three-game scoring average was 8.2 FP. Compared with holding recent form level with the forecast, that scoring history shifts the tree estimate up 0.7 FP. This isolates model sensitivity, not a guaranteed football outcome.
- Recent scoring average: 7.2 FP.
- Last 3 recorded games: 9.0 targets per game.
Malik Nabers
- His prior three-game scoring average was 16.5 FP. Compared with holding recent form level with the forecast, that scoring history shifts the tree estimate down 0.2 FP. This isolates model sensitivity, not a guaranteed football outcome.
- Recent scoring average: 13.8 FP.
- The PHI defensive matchup changes the FF estimate up 10%.
- Last 3 recorded games: 14.0 targets per game.
Drake London
Drake London faces CIN in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 7.2 fantasy points.
Malik Nabers
Malik Nabers faces PHI in Week 9. Recent scoring average: 13.8 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 10%.
Your next decision
Scoring & lineup notes
FORTIFIED RANKINGS ยท ยท WEEK 9 ยท Standard
WR. The bigger picture.
Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.
- 1
Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR ยท SEA vs ARISun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailableMean 17.9Range unavailableMedian unavailableESPN 15.5Sleeper 17.8FantasyPros 16.517.9Expected FP - 2
Puka NacuaWR ยท LAR vs WASSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailableMean 15.9Range unavailableMedian unavailableESPN 15.6Sleeper 15.1FantasyPros 15.415.9Expected FP - 3
CeeDee LambWR ยท DAL vs INDSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailableMean 14.1Range unavailableMedian unavailableESPN 13.5Sleeper 13.6FantasyPros 13.314.1Expected FP
How the forecast and ranges work
FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.
Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10โP90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.
Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.
More Week 9 decisions
Malik Nabers11.9projected FP
CeeDee Lamb14.1projected FP
Malik Nabers11.9projected FP
Justin Jefferson11.7projected FP
Malik Nabers11.9projected FP
Amon-Ra St. Brown13.0projected FP
Malik Nabers11.9projected FP
Mike Evans10.7projected FP
Jaxon Smith-Njigba17.9projected FP
Puka Nacua15.9projected FP
Puka Nacua15.9projected FP
CeeDee Lamb14.1projected FP
CeeDee Lamb14.1projected FP
Tee Higgins14.0projected FP
Tee Higgins14.0projected FP
Ja'Marr Chase13.7projected FP
Ja'Marr Chase13.7projected FP
Amon-Ra St. Brown13.0projected FP
Justin Jefferson11.7projected FP
Drake London11.6projected FP