Should I start Parker Washington or Rhamondre Stevenson this week? Week 8 Half-PPR (2026)

THE FF CALL

Start Parker Washington

+2.2 projected edge · Half-PPR

Start Parker Washington over Rhamondre Stevenson for Week 8 Half-PPR: 14.3 projected points versus 12.1.

Parker Washington: 17.9 FP recent scoring average.
Rhamondre Stevenson: 13.2 FP recent scoring average; 6.25% matchup lift against MIA.

Forecast updated Oct 27, 2026, 11:35 PM ET · Half-PPR

FF PICK

Parker Washington

WR · JACStats & schedule

14.3FF projected

↑ +0.4 vs ESPN

vs IND

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Rhamondre Stevenson

RB · NEStats & schedule

12.1FF projected

↑ +0.5 vs ESPN

at MIA

Sun 4:25 PM ET

Why this pick?

Parker Washington

Fortified14.3

ESPN13.9

Sleeper13.4

FantasyPros13.1

Parker Washington faces IND in Week 8. Recent scoring average: 17.9 fantasy points.

Rhamondre Stevenson

Fortified12.1

ESPN11.6

Sleeper9.3

FantasyPros12.1

Rhamondre Stevenson faces MIA in Week 8. Recent scoring average: 13.2 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast up 6.25%.

Parker Washington projects for 14.3 points in half-PPR scoring, 2.2 more than Rhamondre Stevenson. This is a projection-based recommendation, not a guarantee. Verify the latest injury report and active status before kickoff. FantasyPros refresh is rate-limited. Same-week cached projections are used (under one hour old; oldest update Oct 27, 2026, 11:10 PM ET).

Updated Oct 27, 2026, 11:35 PM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

SEE THE WHOLE SEASON

Don’t just win Sunday.
Win what’s next.

Your roster. Every week.
A plan for the playoffs.

WEEK 8PLAYOFFS ♛

Build my Game Plan Your team. Your league’s rules.See an example GamePlan ↗

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.