Should I drop Mark Andrews for Roschon Johnson?

THE DROP / ADD CALL

Lean: keep Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews retains a 33.1 FP remaining-schedule advantage. The current-week projection also gives no clear reason to make this drop. Check for a lower-cost roster spot if you need coverage. These are player forecast totals, not extra starter points or playoff-odds gains for your team. They share FLEX eligibility, but this move changes your dedicated-position depth.

Forecast updated Oct 30, 4:47 PM ET

PLAYER TO DROP

Mark Andrews

TE · BAL · vs BUF

Stats & schedule ›

4.9FF projected FP

Nov 1, 1:00 PM ET

66.9%rostered on ESPN+0.05 pp recent change

PLAYER TO ADD

Roschon Johnson

RB · CHI · vs SEA

Stats & schedule ›

2.6FF projected FP

Nov 2, 8:15 PM ET

10.8%rostered on ESPN-1.78 pp recent change

WHY THIS MOVE?

A better week is only part of the decision.

Mark Andrews is 66.9% rostered; Roschon Johnson is 10.8% rostered on ESPN. Ownership describes availability across leagues, not yours. Compare the weeks you need covered and the value you give up. A replacement can help now while weakening a later lineup.

Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews projects for 4.9 Standard points against BUF this week. His recent scoring average is 1.2 FP. He is rostered in 66.9% of ESPN leagues, with a reported gain of 0.05 percentage points. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 4.9 FP
ESPN: 5.9 FP
Sleeper: 5.6 FP
FantasyPros: 5.7 FP
Boosted Trees: 6.1 FP
Workload: 4.0 FP
Monte Carlo: 3.9 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · includes FantasyPros stat inputs · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · conditional on availability · central 80%: -0.0–9.5 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Roschon Johnson

Roschon Johnson projects for 2.6 Standard points against SEA this week. His recent scoring average is 5.9 FP. He is rostered in 10.8% of ESPN leagues, with a reported decline of 1.78 percentage points. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 2.6 FP
ESPN: 5.3 FP
Sleeper: 0.8 FP
FantasyPros: 0.7 FP
Boosted Trees: -1.8 FP
Workload: 2.9 FP
Monte Carlo: 3.5 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · central 80%: 0.6–7.6 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Roster snapshot Oct 30, 4:30 PM ET. Saved models support the assessment; they are not independent votes. A full roster and league settings are needed to evaluate starter impact.

THE HOLD, NOT JUST THE CLAIM

What comes after this week?

The Drop / Add assessment uses the immediate and future FF outlook together. Totals describe the player, not extra points for your roster. Weeks 15–18 are a calendar view; your league’s playoff weeks may differ. Green highlights the higher displayed projection when both outlooks are known; ties and incomplete comparisons stay neutral.

Window	Mark Andrews	Roschon Johnson
Next 3 weeks	14.6 FPHigher projection3/3 scheduled games projected	3.9 FP2/2 scheduled games projected · 1 bye
Remaining regular-season schedule	48.0 FPHigher projection10/10 scheduled games projected · 1 bye	14.9 FP10/10 scheduled games projected · 1 bye
Weeks 15–18	19.2 FPHigher projection4/4 scheduled games projected	5.5 FP4/4 scheduled games projected

Weekly Drop / Add outlook

Week	Mark Andrews	Roschon Johnson
Week 8	4.9 FPvs BUFHigher projection	2.6 FPvs SEA
Week 9	4.8 FPvs JACHigher projection	1.3 FPvs TB
Week 10	4.9 FPvs LACHigher projection	BYE
Week 11	4.6 FPvs CARHigher projection	1.5 FPvs NO
Week 12	4.7 FPvs HOUHigher projection	1.4 FPvs DET
Week 13	BYE	1.2 FPvs JACHigher projection
Week 14	4.9 FPvs TBHigher projection	1.4 FPvs MIA
Week 15	4.8 FPvs PITHigher projection	1.4 FPvs BUF
Week 16	4.6 FPvs CLEHigher projection	1.4 FPvs GB
Week 17	5.0 FPvs CINHigher projection	1.4 FPvs DET
Week 18	4.8 FPvs PITHigher projection	1.2 FPvs MIN

Outlook updated Oct 30, 4:55 PM ET. Health and roles can change.

PICKUP RANKINGS · FLEX

More options. The same scale.

FF–Monte Carlo midpoint order within this pickup pool. The window connects two estimates; it is not a confidence interval. Rankings may differ from the FF points-only call above.

6.2 FP8.0 FP