Should I drop Jonah Coleman for Dylan Sampson?

THE DROP / ADD CALL

Lean: keep Jonah Coleman

Jonah Coleman retains a 33.3 FP remaining-schedule advantage. The current-week projection also gives no clear reason to make this drop. Check for a lower-cost roster spot if you need coverage. These are player forecast totals, not extra starter points or playoff-odds gains for your team.

Forecast updated Oct 30, 12:49 PM ET

PLAYER TO DROP

Jonah Coleman

RB · DEN · vs KC

Stats & schedule ›

7.1FF projected FP

Nov 1, 4:25 PM ET

43.9%rostered on ESPN+2.23 pp recent change

PLAYER TO ADD

Dylan Sampson

RB · CLE · vs PIT

Stats & schedule ›

5.0FF projected FP

Nov 1, 1:00 PM ET

10.8%rostered on ESPN+0.36 pp recent change

WHY THIS MOVE?

A better week is only part of the decision.

Jonah Coleman is 43.9% rostered; Dylan Sampson is 10.8% rostered on ESPN. Ownership describes availability across leagues, not yours. Compare the weeks you need covered and the value you give up. A replacement can help now while weakening a later lineup.

Jonah Coleman

Jonah Coleman projects for 7.1 Standard points against KC this week. His recent scoring average is 6.9 FP. The defensive matchup reduces the FF estimate by 1.25%. He is rostered in 43.9% of ESPN leagues, with a reported gain of 2.23 percentage points. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 7.1 FP
ESPN: 6.3 FP
Sleeper: 8.4 FP
FantasyPros: 7.3 FP
Boosted Trees: 0.7 FP
Workload: 5.9 FP
Monte Carlo: 6.1 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · includes FantasyPros stat inputs · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · central 80%: 1.6–12.2 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Dylan Sampson

Dylan Sampson projects for 5.0 Standard points against PIT this week. His recent scoring average is 7.7 FP. The defensive matchup reduces the FF estimate by 2.5%. He is rostered in 10.8% of ESPN leagues, with a reported gain of 0.36 percentage points. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 5.0 FP
ESPN: 4.1 FP
Sleeper: 4.6 FP
FantasyPros: 4.6 FP
Boosted Trees: 2.7 FP
Workload: 3.6 FP
Monte Carlo: 3.5 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · central 80%: 0.4–7.5 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Roster snapshot Oct 30, 12:30 PM ET. Saved models support the assessment; they are not independent votes. A full roster and league settings are needed to evaluate starter impact.

THE HOLD, NOT JUST THE CLAIM

What comes after this week?

The Drop / Add assessment uses the immediate and future FF outlook together. Totals describe the player, not extra points for your roster. Weeks 15–18 are a calendar view; your league’s playoff weeks may differ. Green highlights the higher displayed projection when both outlooks are known; ties and incomplete comparisons stay neutral.

Window	Jonah Coleman	Dylan Sampson
Next 3 weeks	16.4 FPHigher projection2/2 scheduled games projected · 1 bye	15.7 FP3/3 scheduled games projected
Remaining regular-season schedule	84.3 FPHigher projection10/10 scheduled games projected · 1 bye	51.0 FP10/10 scheduled games projected · 1 bye
Weeks 15–18	34.3 FPHigher projection4/4 scheduled games projected	19.6 FP4/4 scheduled games projected

Weekly Drop / Add outlook

Week	Jonah Coleman	Dylan Sampson
Week 8	7.1 FPvs KCHigher projection	5.0 FPvs PIT
Week 9	9.2 FPvs CARHigher projection	5.7 FPvs NO
Week 10	BYE	5.0 FPvs HOUHigher projection
Week 11	9.7 FPvs LVHigher projection	BYE
Week 12	6.8 FPvs PITHigher projection	5.8 FPvs LV
Week 13	9.2 FPvs MIAHigher projection	4.9 FPvs CIN
Week 14	7.9 FPvs NYJHigher projection	5.0 FPvs ATL
Week 15	9.4 FPvs LVHigher projection	5.1 FPvs NYG
Week 16	8.9 FPvs BUFHigher projection	4.6 FPvs BAL
Week 17	7.5 FPvs NEHigher projection	5.2 FPvs IND
Week 18	8.4 FPvs LACHigher projection	4.8 FPvs CIN

Outlook updated Oct 30, 12:56 PM ET. Health and roles can change.

PICKUP RANKINGS · RB

More options. The same scale.

FF–Monte Carlo midpoint order within this pickup pool. The window connects two estimates; it is not a confidence interval. Rankings may differ from the FF points-only call above.

5.4 FP7.1 FP