Should I drop Mark Andrews for Malik Washington?

THE DROP / ADD CALL

Check the pickup before making a move

Malik Washington needs a current availability or game-status check. Do not drop Mark Andrews on the strength of an unresolved projection.

Forecast updated Oct 30, 12:12 PM ET

PLAYER TO DROP

Mark Andrews

TE · BAL · vs BUF

Stats & schedule ›

8.4FF projected FP

Nov 1, 1:00 PM ET

66.9%rostered on ESPN+0.01 pp recent change

PLAYER TO ADD

Malik Washington

WR · MIA · vs NE

Stats & schedule ›

10.1FF projected FP

Nov 1, 4:25 PM ET

Check availability before adding

37.5%rostered on ESPN-0.48 pp recent change

WHY THIS MOVE?

A better week is only part of the decision.

Mark Andrews is 66.9% rostered; Malik Washington is 37.5% rostered on ESPN. Ownership describes availability across leagues, not yours. Compare the weeks you need covered and the value you give up. A replacement can help now while weakening a later lineup.

Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews projects for 8.4 PPR points against BUF this week. His recent scoring average is 3.8 FP. He is rostered in 66.9% of ESPN leagues, with a reported gain of 0.01 percentage points. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 8.4 FP
ESPN: 9.6 FP
Sleeper: 9.1 FP
FantasyPros: 9.3 FP
Boosted Trees: 10.0 FP
Workload: 7.0 FP
Monte Carlo: 6.8 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:26 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · includes FantasyPros stat inputs · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · conditional on availability · central 80%: -0.3–16.1 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Malik Washington

Malik Washington projects for 10.1 PPR points against NE this week. His recent scoring average is 9.3 FP. He is rostered in 37.5% of ESPN leagues, with a reported decline of 0.48 percentage points. His injury designation makes this a conditional pickup; verify his status before committing. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 10.1 FP
ESPN: 10.2 FP
Sleeper: 9.3 FP
FantasyPros: 10.0 FP
Boosted Trees: 10.2 FP
Workload: 10.5 FP
Monte Carlo: 10.7 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:26 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · conditional on availability · central 80%: 1.3–21.0 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Roster snapshot Oct 30, 11:30 AM ET. Saved models support the assessment; they are not independent votes. A full roster and league settings are needed to evaluate starter impact.

THE HOLD, NOT JUST THE CLAIM

What comes after this week?

The Drop / Add assessment uses the immediate and future FF outlook together. Totals describe the player, not extra points for your roster. Weeks 15–18 are a calendar view; your league’s playoff weeks may differ. Green highlights the higher displayed projection when both outlooks are known; ties and incomplete comparisons stay neutral.

Window	Mark Andrews	Malik Washington
Next 3 weeks	25.1 FP3/3 scheduled games projected	32.0 FPHigher projection3/3 scheduled games projected
Remaining regular-season schedule	82.3 FP10/10 scheduled games projected · 1 bye	115.2 FPHigher projection11/11 scheduled games projected
Weeks 15–18	32.9 FP4/4 scheduled games projected	41.9 FPHigher projection4/4 scheduled games projected

Weekly Drop / Add outlook

Week	Mark Andrews	Malik Washington
Week 8	8.4 FPvs BUF	10.1 FPvs NEHigher projection
Week 9	8.4 FPvs JAC	11.7 FPvs DETHigher projection
Week 10	8.3 FPvs LAC	10.2 FPvs INDHigher projection
Week 11	8.0 FPvs CAR	11.4 FPvs BUFHigher projection
Week 12	7.9 FPvs HOU	10.2 FPvs NYJHigher projection
Week 13	BYE	9.1 FPvs DENHigher projection
Week 14	8.4 FPvs TB	10.6 FPvs CHIHigher projection
Week 15	8.2 FPvs PIT	10.1 FPvs GBHigher projection
Week 16	7.9 FPvs CLE	10.2 FPvs LACHigher projection
Week 17	8.5 FPvs CIN	11.5 FPvs BUFHigher projection
Week 18	8.2 FPvs PIT	10.1 FPvs NEHigher projection

Outlook updated Oct 30, 12:32 PM ET. Health and roles can change.

PICKUP RANKINGS · FLEX

More options. The same scale.

FF–Monte Carlo midpoint order within this pickup pool. The window connects two estimates; it is not a confidence interval. Rankings may differ from the FF points-only call above.

8.4 FP12.6 FP