Should I drop RJ Harvey for Kimani Vidal?

THE DROP / ADD CALL

Lean: keep RJ Harvey

RJ Harvey retains a 4.9 FP remaining-schedule advantage. The current-week projection also gives no clear reason to make this drop. Check for a lower-cost roster spot if you need coverage. These are player forecast totals, not extra starter points or playoff-odds gains for your team. RJ Harvey is questionable; an injury designation alone is not a reason to drop him.

Forecast updated Oct 30, 1:04 PM ET

PLAYER TO DROP

RJ Harvey

RB · DEN · vs KC

Stats & schedule ›

7.0FF projected FP

Nov 1, 4:25 PM ET

Check current availability

75.7%rostered on ESPN-0.43 pp recent change

PLAYER TO ADD

Kimani Vidal

RB · LAC · vs LAR

Stats & schedule ›

6.5FF projected FP

Nov 1, 4:05 PM ET

13.3%rostered on ESPN+2.80 pp recent change

WHY THIS MOVE?

A better week is only part of the decision.

RJ Harvey is 75.7% rostered; Kimani Vidal is 13.3% rostered on ESPN. Ownership describes availability across leagues, not yours. Compare the weeks you need covered and the value you give up. A replacement can help now while weakening a later lineup.

RJ Harvey

RJ Harvey projects for 7.0 Half-PPR points against KC this week. His recent scoring average is 8.9 FP. The defensive matchup reduces the FF estimate by 1.25%. He is rostered in 75.7% of ESPN leagues, with a reported decline of 0.43 percentage points. His injury designation needs monitoring; it does not by itself justify dropping him. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 7.0 FP
ESPN: 7.5 FP
Sleeper: 6.7 FP
FantasyPros: 6.7 FP
Boosted Trees: 6.6 FP
Workload: 6.9 FP
Monte Carlo: 7.4 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · includes FantasyPros stat inputs · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · central 80%: 2.1–14.3 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Kimani Vidal

Kimani Vidal projects for 6.5 Half-PPR points against LAR this week. His recent scoring average is 8.8 FP. He is rostered in 13.3% of ESPN leagues, with a reported gain of 2.80 percentage points. Roster trends measure manager activity, not a guarantee of playing time or availability in your league.

Fortified Fantasy: 6.5 FP
ESPN: 6.9 FP
Sleeper: 6.1 FP
FantasyPros: 5.2 FP
Boosted Trees: 7.2 FP
Workload: 6.2 FP
Monte Carlo: 6.5 FP

Boosted Trees: Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:04 AM ET
Workload: Experimental · saved Oct 28, 9:08 PM ET
Monte Carlo: Experimental · central 80%: 1.9–12.7 FP · saved Oct 28, 9:16 PM ET

Roster snapshot Oct 30, 12:30 PM ET. Saved models support the assessment; they are not independent votes. A full roster and league settings are needed to evaluate starter impact.

THE HOLD, NOT JUST THE CLAIM

What comes after this week?

The Drop / Add assessment uses the immediate and future FF outlook together. Totals describe the player, not extra points for your roster. Weeks 15–18 are a calendar view; your league’s playoff weeks may differ. Green highlights the higher displayed projection when both outlooks are known; ties and incomplete comparisons stay neutral.

Window	RJ Harvey	Kimani Vidal
Next 3 weeks	15.3 FP2/2 scheduled games projected · 1 bye	19.9 FPHigher projection3/3 scheduled games projected
Remaining regular-season schedule	80.2 FPHigher projection10/10 scheduled games projected · 1 bye	75.3 FP11/11 scheduled games projected
Weeks 15–18	32.3 FPHigher projection4/4 scheduled games projected	27.4 FP4/4 scheduled games projected

Weekly Drop / Add outlook

Week	RJ Harvey	Kimani Vidal
Week 8	7.0 FPvs KCHigher projection	6.5 FPvs LAR
Week 9	8.3 FPvs CARHigher projection	7.0 FPvs HOU
Week 10	BYE	6.5 FPvs BALHigher projection
Week 11	8.8 FPvs LVHigher projection	7.0 FPvs NYJ
Week 12	7.3 FPvs PITHigher projection	6.9 FPvs NE
Week 13	8.9 FPvs MIAHigher projection	6.1 FPvs TB
Week 14	7.6 FPvs NYJ	8.0 FPvs LVHigher projection
Week 15	8.6 FPvs LVHigher projection	6.6 FPvs SF
Week 16	8.5 FPvs BUFHigher projection	7.8 FPvs MIA
Week 17	7.5 FPvs NEHigher projection	6.5 FPvs KC
Week 18	7.7 FPvs LACHigher projection	6.6 FPvs DEN

Outlook updated Oct 30, 1:17 PM ET. Health and roles can change.

PICKUP RANKINGS · RB

More options. The same scale.

FF–Monte Carlo midpoint order within this pickup pool. The window connects two estimates; it is not a confidence interval. Rankings may differ from the FF points-only call above.

5.4 FP8.3 FP