Should I start Adam Randall or Will Mallory? (Standard Week 14 2026)

THE FF CALL

Slight lean: Adam Randall

The displayed FF scores are tied, and ESPN does not separate them on a comparable margin. Adam Randall has the higher unrounded FF forecast (0.34 versus 0.30 FP).

Adam Randall: 10% matchup reduction against TB.
Will Mallory: 0.0 FP recent scoring average.

Forecast updated Nov 13, 2026, 3:26 AM ET · Standard

FF PICK

Adam Randall

RB · BALStats & schedule

0.3FF projected

vs TB

Sun 1:00 PM ET

THE ALTERNATIVE

Will Mallory

TE · INDStats & schedule

0.3FF projected

at PHI

Sun 1:00 PM ET

Why this pick?

Adam Randall

FF projection: 0.3 FP
Sleeper: 0.2 FP
FantasyPros: 0.7 FP
Boosted Trees: -0.7 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Adam Randall faces TB in Week 14. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 10%.

Will Mallory

FF projection: 0.3 FP
Sleeper: 0.2 FP
Boosted Trees: 1.2 FP; Experimental · saved Oct 27, 12:03 AM ET

Will Mallory faces PHI in Week 14. Recent scoring average: 0.0 fantasy points. The position-specific defensive matchup adjusts the forecast down 1.25%.

The displayed FF scores are tied, and ESPN does not separate them on a comparable margin. Adam Randall has the higher unrounded FF forecast (0.34 versus 0.30 FP).

Updated Nov 13, 2026, 3:26 AM ET. Projections can change before kickoff.

Your next decision

Tap a player for alternatives, or search a name.

First playerSecond player

Scoring & lineup notes

PPR awards one point per reception; half-PPR awards 0.5; standard awards none. Custom league rules can change the result. Confirm active status, kickoff and lineup locks. Projections are estimates; completed-week scores are actuals.

FORTIFIED RANKINGS · Rankings position

FLEX. The bigger picture.

Ranked by FF expected points. Displayed ties favor the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin. Medians and ranges add context.

FF expected pointsMedian · when availableWindow: experimental middle 80%● ESPN● Sleeper● FantasyPros

3 shown · common FP scale

15.622.7

FF MEAN

1
Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET vs TENSun 1:00 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 21.4Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 22.7Sleeper 22.0FantasyPros 18.1
21.4Expected FP
2
Kenneth Walker IIIRB · KC vs CINSun 4:25 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 19.2Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 20.6Sleeper 19.5FantasyPros 16.5
19.2Expected FP
3
James Cook IIIRB · BUF vs GBSun 8:20 PM ETRange unavailable
Mean 17.8Range unavailable
Median unavailable
ESPN 15.6Sleeper 16.5FantasyPros 16.8
17.8Expected FP

How the forecast and ranges work

FF uses position-specific provider weights, rescored CBS and FFToday stats, and the existing bounded form, defense and metric adjustments. Saved Boosted Trees and Workload have bounded model influence when available. Monte Carlo supplies the distribution; it does not get a duplicate mean vote.

Every player is ranked by the FF expected score (mean), whether or not a simulation distribution is available. Equal displayed scores use the higher FF-minus-ESPN margin when both ESPN forecasts are known, then unrounded FF, a comparable FantasyPros/Sleeper estimate, and stable identity order if still level. This tiebreaker is not a measured probability of beating ESPN. The median marker is additional information and never changes the order. Missing or availability-conditional ranges do not switch the ranking statistic. The window shows the experimental middle 80% (P10–P90), rather than the difference between two model means. Its observed coverage under this new version is still collecting. Availability-conditional distributions are labeled and are not shifted to a different center.

Missing sources and incompatible scoring are excluded. Bye and confirmed unavailable players remain excluded. ESPN, Sleeper and FantasyPros are the benchmark markers. The common scale covers the displayed outcome windows and available benchmarks.